Home / Buy a Business / Property Management

Buying a Property Management Business: The 2026 Buyer’s Playbook

Updated June 2026 · CT Acquisitions

Buying a property management business in 2026 is a different exercise than buying any other home services category. The revenue is structurally recurring, the AUM is itself a moat, and software lock-in around AppFolio, Buildium, and Yardi produces switching costs no HVAC operator can match. But the segment is fragmented across five sub-verticals (HOA, single-family rental, multifamily, commercial / CRE, and STR / vacation), each with different unit economics and different active buyers. The discipline is matching thesis to sub-vertical before underwriting the first deal.

This buyer-side playbook is built for PE platforms, strategics like FirstService Residential, family offices stacking long-hold income, and operator-led roll-ups. We cover what each sub-vertical is worth, who the credible competitors are, what software lock-in does to valuations, and the diligence experienced buyers run before signing an LOI.

Why property management is the stickiest vertical

Three structural attributes make buying a property management business one of the most defensible plays in lower-middle-market services M&A.

First, contractual recurring revenue against a non-discretionary base. A community association does not stop needing a manager. A multifamily owner cannot self-manage 400 units across three states. A homeowner with a rental in another city has no realistic substitute. The management agreement renews automatically year over year, and the typical retention rate in HOA management exceeds 92% on a portfolio basis. That stickiness is the foundation of every PE thesis in the space.

Second, switching costs that are structurally high. Moving an HOA off Associa or FirstService Residential is not just a software migration. It is a board vote, a 60 to 90 day transition, an accounting handoff, a vendor contract reassignment, and a real risk of dropped service during the handover. Even when boards are unhappy, the inertia is significant. The same dynamic applies to multifamily owners using AppFolio or Yardi as their property accounting backbone.

Third, operating efficiency at scale on the management platform. The marginal cost of adding the 50th community to a regional HOA manager is meaningfully lower than the first. The accounting team, the violation processing workflow, the architectural review queue, and the board portal are all fixed-cost infrastructure that scales. A platform with 800 communities under management produces materially higher EBITDA margins than five independents with 160 communities each. That is the math that funds every roll-up.

The combination explains why FirstService Residential (an operating segment of FirstService Corporation, NYSE: FSV) has built the largest residential PM platform in North America, and why PE has launched at least three new HOA platforms in the 18 months to mid-2026.

The five sub-verticals and what each actually is

The term “property management” covers operating models that share only the surface. Buyers who confuse the categories underwrite the wrong economics. The five distinct businesses:

1. HOA and community association management (CAM)

Managing condominium associations, homeowners associations, and master-planned communities on behalf of resident-elected boards. Revenue is a flat monthly fee per door (typically $12 to $35), plus architectural reviews, transfer fees, collections, and developer transitions. The largest pure-play category, with roughly 374,000 community associations in the US per CAI Foundation data, housing about 76 million Americans. Multiples are the highest in property management because the recurring math is the cleanest.

2. Single-family rental (SFR) property management

Managing third-party-owned single-family homes for individual or institutional owners. Revenue is typically 8 to 12% of monthly rent collected, plus leasing fees (50 to 100% of one month’s rent), renewals, and maintenance markups. Fragmented across thousands of regional operators on AppFolio or Buildium. Lower multiples than HOA because retention is weaker (owners sell, tenants turn) and unit economics are tougher.

3. Multifamily property management

Third-party management of apartment communities for institutional owners (REITs, pension funds, syndicators). Fees run 3 to 5% of effective gross income, plus leasing commissions and construction management. Dominated by Greystar (largest apartment manager in the US with more than 940,000 units), Cushman & Wakefield, and Asset Living (Roark Capital).

4. Commercial and CRE property management

Office, retail, industrial, and mixed-use management for institutional owners. Fees are 1.5 to 3% of gross collected rents, plus leasing commissions, project management, and engineering services. Cushman & Wakefield (NYSE: CWK), JLL, and CBRE sit at the institutional end. Below them is a long tail of regional commercial managers, many family-owned, several actively shopping in 2026.

5. Short-term rental and vacation rental management

Managing vacation homes and STR units for individual owners. Revenue is typically 20 to 35% of nightly rent. Higher take rates, higher volatility, higher operational intensity. The Vacasa to Casago transaction at $128.6M in April 2025 (Casago founder and CEO Steve Schwab leading; the deal took Vacasa private) set the comp for the segment. Below the top, hundreds of regional STR operators run at single-digit margins or worse, and the buyer set is meaningfully thinner than in HOA.

What buyers are paying in 2026

The multiple spread across sub-verticals is wider than in any other home services category. A 12x HOA platform and a 6x SFR business are not anomalies, they are the rule. Here is what the market is actually clearing at in 2026:

These ranges have moved upward in HOA over the last 18 months, driven by the entry of new platforms backed by Charlesbank Capital Partners, FFL Partners, and Alpine Investors. Multifamily PM multiples have held flat as institutional owners renegotiate fee structures downward. STR multiples have compressed since the 2021 to 2022 peak, with the Vacasa to Casago transaction repricing the entire segment downward from the highs.

The factors that move multiples within a sub-vertical are consistent. Buyers underwrite:

• Retention. Annualized portfolio retention rate. HOA platforms expect 92%+. SFR operators settle for 75 to 85%. STR operators are often below 70%.
• Owner or board concentration. No single owner or community above 8% of revenue is platform-grade. Above 15% triggers discount; above 25% kills the deal.
• Software stack and data quality. AppFolio, Buildium, Yardi Voyager, or RealPage with clean data is a premium. Spreadsheets and QuickBooks are a discount.
• Fee structure transparency. Bundled all-in management fees are easier to underwrite than fee-for-service models with ancillary revenue dependence.
• Management team depth. Founder-dependent operators trade at 25 to 35% discount. Bench depth, especially a credible COO and accounting leadership, is platform criteria.
• Regulatory and licensing posture. In CAM-licensing states, clean license inventory and active CMCA, AMS, or PCAM credentials carry a small but real premium.

The AUM fee math every buyer runs

Every credible buyer in property management runs the same arithmetic before opening a quality of earnings. The core formula is AUM multiplied by the realized fee rate, less direct operating cost per door, applied across the portfolio. Buyers want to see the per-door economics broken out and stress-tested.

HOA / CAM

Doors multiplied by monthly fee per door multiplied by 12, plus 15 to 25% ancillary revenue (architectural reviews, transfer fees, collections). A 6,000-door regional manager at $22 average per door produces $1.8M to $2.0M in total revenue. EBITDA margins run 18 to 28%, so that operator produces $325K to $560K of EBITDA. At a 9x multiple, the platform pays $2.9M to $5.0M.

SFR

Doors multiplied by monthly rent multiplied by 12 multiplied by fee rate (8 to 10%), plus leasing fees (50 to 100% of one month’s rent on a 30 to 50% annual turn), plus renewals and maintenance markups. A 1,500-door operator at $1,900 rent and 9% fee produces $3.08M base, with leasing adding $600K to $900K. EBITDA margins run 20 to 30%.

Multifamily

Units multiplied by effective gross income per unit multiplied by fee (3 to 5%). A 20,000-unit manager at $14,000 EGI per unit at 3.5% fee generates $9.8M in base fees, with leasing and construction management on top.

Commercial / CRE

Square feet multiplied by gross rent per square foot multiplied by fee (1.5 to 3%). A 5M-square-foot portfolio at $28 gross at 2.5% fee generates $3.5M in base fees, with leasing and project management adding 30 to 50%.

STR

Units multiplied by nightly rate multiplied by occupancy multiplied by 365 multiplied by take rate (20 to 35%). A 400-unit operator at $250 nightly, 55% occupancy, and 25% take generates $5.0M. EBITDA margins are thin (8 to 15%) due to cleaning, guest support, and dynamic-pricing intensity.

The math is straightforward; the diligence is validating each input. Buyers do not accept seller representations on door count, retention, fee rate, or ancillary revenue without independent verification.

Who the active buyers actually are

Knowing the competitive set matters because it shapes both your sourcing strategy (where the deals are going) and your structuring options (what the alternative bidder will offer). The active buyers in 2026:

Public strategics

FirstService Residential is the operating subsidiary of FirstService Corporation (NYSE: FSV), the largest residential community manager in North America with more than 9,500 communities and 2.2 million units under management in 2026. FSV rolls up tuck-ins quarterly. Cushman & Wakefield (NYSE: CWK) is the dominant commercial strategic. JLL (NYSE: JLL) and CBRE (NYSE: CBRE) compete at the institutional commercial end.

Private equity HOA platforms

Associa is the second-largest residential community manager in the US, with roughly 7,500 communities under management. It is led by chairman and founder John Carona and remains family-controlled with operating partnership from management. Associa is NOT owned by Hellman & Friedman; that attribution is a common mistake. RealManage was acquired by American Securities in a transaction announced June 2, 2022. American Securities, not Apax, is the sponsor. RealManage continues to be an active acquirer of regional HOA portfolios. KWPMC (Kaye-Bender Rembaum / Wise Property Management Concepts portfolio) was acquired by Odevo in September 2022, the Swedish-headquartered global property management consolidator. Odevo has been actively pursuing US tuck-ins since.

The 18 months ending mid-2026 have produced three new HOA-focused platforms, each notable for being a first-time PE sponsor entry rather than a recap:

• CMH (Community Management Holdings) backed by Charlesbank Capital Partners.
• Oakline backed by Alpine Investors.
• Pioneer backed by FFL Partners.

These three platforms, plus the established Associa, FirstService Residential, RealManage / American Securities, and KWPMC / Odevo, form the competitive set for any HOA add-on in the $1M to $10M EBITDA range. New entrants are still arriving.

Multifamily and SFR sponsors

Asset Living is backed by Roark Capital, not Cardinal Industries as sometimes reported. Asset Living manages more than 250,000 units across the US and is the third-largest student housing manager. Olympus Property is backed by Levine Leichtman Capital Partners. Greystar remains independently held by founder Bob Faith and operates the largest apartment management platform in the world. Inspire Communities (manufactured housing communities) has been a portfolio company of Apollo since 2017. Inframark (utility-district and infrastructure-adjacent community management) is backed by Highview Capital.

STR consolidators

Casago is now the largest vacation rental platform in North America following the April 30, 2025 take-private of Vacasa at approximately $128.6M, led by Casago founder and CEO Steve Schwab with backing from Roofstock and a syndicate of family office capital. Below Casago sits a much thinner field of regional STR managers, most of whom are still working through the post-pandemic occupancy normalization.

Family offices and independent sponsors

Family offices and independent sponsors are increasingly active in the $1M to $5M EBITDA range, particularly in HOA and commercial PM where the recurring fee math fits long-hold capital. These buyers compete on patience, structure, and the explicit commitment to not flip the asset to a strategic in 5 years.

Software lock-in as a valuation premium

The property management software stack is the most underappreciated valuation lever in the segment. Buyers underwrite software two ways: as a moat (high switching costs make customer churn lower) and as a risk (poor data hygiene makes integration painful and expensive).

The four-platform reality

AppFolio (NASDAQ: APPF) is the dominant SFR and small-multifamily platform, with roughly 20,000 customers managing more than 8 million units. Sellers on AppFolio with 3+ years of clean data carry a premium. Buildium is now part of RealPage (taken private by Thoma Bravo in April 2021 at $10.2B) and serves more than 18,000 small-PM operators. Yardi Voyager and Yardi Breeze are the institutional standard for multifamily and commercial. RealPage (also Thoma Bravo, separate from Buildium) is the other institutional multifamily standard.

What buyers look for

Three signals matter most:

• Migration history. 5+ years on the same platform means clean data, mature workflows, and minimal integration risk. Two migrations in three years means data fragmentation that takes 12 to 18 months to unwind.
• Workflow automation. How much of architectural review, violation processing, work-order dispatch, and resident communication runs through the software versus through email and phone.
• Portal adoption. Below 60% adoption signals operational drag. Above 85% is best-in-class.

Software lock-in cuts both ways. A platform standardized on AppFolio absorbs migration cost when acquiring a Yardi shop. Platform-agnostic buyers have flexibility but lose the IT-scale benefit. Most sophisticated platforms have made a stack decision and source within that ecosystem.

State CAM licensing: the patchwork buyers underwrite

Community association management is a state-licensed activity in 8 states as of 2026: Florida, Nevada, California, Arizona, Texas, Colorado, Hawaii, and North Carolina. Each state has distinct requirements, distinct continuing education obligations, and distinct enforcement postures. Buyers acquiring multi-state HOA portfolios underwrite licensing as a real operational risk.

Florida

Florida Statute 468 Part VIII requires a CAM license for any individual managing condominiums or HOAs with 10+ units or budgets exceeding $100,000 annually. Florida has the largest CAM workforce in the US and the most active enforcement.

Nevada

Nevada Administrative Code Chapter 116A requires a Community Association Manager license through the Nevada Real Estate Division, plus a Provisional CAM entry-level designation and specific bonding requirements.

California

California does not require state-level licensure but recognizes the Certified Common Interest Development Manager (CCIDM) credential as the industry standard. The Davis-Stirling Act governs HOA operations.

Arizona, Texas, Colorado, Hawaii, North Carolina

Each has distinct licensing or registration frameworks. Arizona requires state CAM certification through the Arizona Department of Real Estate. Texas requires CAM registration through TREC for managers serving condominiums. Colorado’s requirements have evolved through 2024 to 2026 legislative cycles. Hawaii has separate condominium-market rules. North Carolina has voluntary CMCA adoption.

Beyond state licensing, industry-standard credentials are CMCA, AMS, and PCAM, administered through the Community Associations Institute (CAI). Portfolio credential depth is a real differentiator on platform-grade transactions.

Due diligence: the property management deep dive

Standard quality of earnings, legal, and insurance diligence is necessary but not sufficient. The category-specific work is where buyers find value and avoid losses.

AUM and door-count reconciliation

Reconcile every claimed door, unit, or community against three sources: the management agreement library, the software-system door-count export, and the actual billing history. Sellers often count units under contract that are not yet generating revenue (developer transitions in progress, communities in 30-day cancellation notice). Real AUM is what is billing today and renewing in 90 days.

Contract review

Read every material management agreement. HOA contracts typically run 1 to 3 year initial terms with annual renewals; cancellation provisions, change-of-control language, and price-escalation mechanisms matter enormously. Look for change-of-control restrictions that trigger consent requirements, below-market pricing that creates near-term cash-flow gaps, and termination-for-convenience clauses that allow owners to walk on 30-day notice.

Retention cohort analysis

Slice the portfolio by year the community or owner was acquired and plot survival rates. A healthy HOA platform shows >90% year-one retention decaying to >85% by year five. A weak platform shows year-three drop-offs that suggest service deterioration or competitor encroachment.

Board health audit (HOA only)

The board is the customer. Pull recent board meeting minutes and identify in-process complaints, RFP processes for alternative managers, or open litigation between the association and the manager. Boards in active conflict with the incumbent are at high risk of transferring within 12 months of close.

Software data hygiene

Request a read-only export from AppFolio, Buildium, Yardi, or RealPage covering 24 months of transactions, work orders, and resident communication. Audit trial-balance integrity, work-order completion rate, AR aging, and resident portal adoption.

Trust accounting compliance

Property managers handle owner and association funds in trust. In all CAM-licensing states, trust accounting compliance is regulated with formal reconciliation requirements. Pull 24 months of trust-account reconciliations and tie them to bank statements. Any discrepancies are deal-killers; they often signal commingling, embezzlement, or accounting incompetence.

Insurance posture

Pull E&O, fidelity bond, cyber liability, and general liability policies, claim history (5 years), and pending litigation. E&O claim frequency above industry baseline (one claim per 200 properties under management per year for SFR; lower for HOA) signals operational issues.

Structuring the offer

Property management deal structures rhyme with other recurring-revenue services but have category-specific quirks worth knowing before submitting an LOI.

The standard property management deal structure

• Cash at close: 60 to 75% of total consideration in platform deals. Higher in clean exits.
• Seller rollover equity: 5 to 20% when the seller continues operating, particularly in HOA platforms where the existing brand and community-board relationships are critical to retention.
• Earnout: 10 to 25% over 18 to 36 months, typically tied to AUM retention (door count or community count) rather than EBITDA.
• Escrow: 10 to 15% held 12 to 24 months against indemnification claims, with separate trust-accounting and licensing reps often carved out for longer-tail exposure.
• Seller note: 5 to 15%, often subordinated, common in independent-sponsor and family-office deals.

The retention-linked earnout

The right earnout in property management is door retention or community retention measured 12 to 24 months post-close against a stated baseline. This rewards the seller for the work of preserving the customer base through the transition and aligns interests during the highest-risk integration window. EBITDA-linked earnouts are a poor fit because buyers control post-close cost allocation; sellers will not perform when the metric is EBITDA.

Where sophisticated buyers differentiate

Property management sellers, particularly HOA founders, weight non-price factors heavily. Cultural continuity, brand preservation (does the local brand stay or get rebranded), and key-employee retention typically outrank a 10 to 15% price premium for many founders. Buyers who pre-commit to: keeping the local brand for 3 to 5 years, retaining the founder as regional president for 24 months, and locking in retention bonuses for the operations manager and accounting lead will routinely win against higher-priced bids. The reason is simple: property management is a relationship business, and founders know that destroying those relationships destroys the value they spent decades building.

Financing a property management acquisition

Capital structure varies by buyer type and deal size. Some patterns are consistent in 2026:

SBA 7(a) loans

SBA 7(a) financing works for property management deals up to $5M purchase price, with the standard caveats: 10% minimum equity injection, 10-year amortization, and seller operational exit within 12 months. Property management lends itself well to SBA because the recurring fee revenue produces predictable debt service coverage. For deals where the seller needs to stay 2+ years, SBA is structurally a poor fit.

Commercial bank acquisition lending

Regional and community banks with services-business experience will lend 2.5 to 4.0x EBITDA at prime plus 1.5 to 2.5%. Property management debt typically clears at the higher end of services lending because lenders recognize the recurring revenue quality. Cash flow covenants are typical, often with separate covenants around AUM retention.

Mezzanine and unitranche

For platform deals or large independent transactions ($5M+ EBITDA), mezzanine or unitranche bridges the gap between senior debt and equity. Rates run 10 to 14% with warrants. Twin Brook, Monroe Capital, Antares Capital, and regional SBIC funds are active in property management mezz.

Seller financing

Often 5 to 15% of purchase price, subordinated, 5 to 7 year term, at 6 to 8%. Common in family-office and independent-sponsor deals where the seller is willing to defer for the right buyer.

Red flags that kill property management deals

Some property management deals should not close. The recurring patterns:

• Trust-accounting discrepancies. Any unexplained variance between trust account ledger and bank reconciliation is a deal-killer. Even small discrepancies signal accounting incompetence or worse.
• Board-level complaints in process. HOA targets with multiple boards actively soliciting competing manager bids are at high transfer risk within 12 months of close.
• AUM concentration above 25%. A single owner-investor representing more than 25% of revenue (common in SFR) effectively means the buyer is acquiring one customer relationship, not a business.
• License gaps in regulated states. Operating in Florida, Nevada, or other CAM-licensing states without current credentials creates regulatory exposure and potential fee disgorgement.
• Recent software migration with data fragmentation. A migration completed in the last 12 months with incomplete data carryover means buyers inherit reconciliation work that is often more expensive than the savings on purchase price.
• E&O claim frequency above baseline. Above-average claim frequency signals operational issues that take 18 to 24 months to remediate.
• Founder personally holds the key-community relationships. If the founder is the named contact on 30%+ of community contracts and has personal relationships with the board presidents, the post-close transition is high-risk.

The CT Acquisitions perspective

We work both sides of the property management market: introducing sellers to qualified buyers and sourcing deal flow for the buyer networks that have engaged us. A few patterns from the last 36 months:

• HOA is the most competitively-bid sub-vertical right now. The combination of three new platforms (CMH / Charlesbank, Oakline / Alpine, Pioneer / FFL) entering the field on top of the established Associa, FirstService Residential, RealManage / American Securities, and KWPMC / Odevo means platform-grade HOA targets receive 5+ LOIs. Multiples have moved up accordingly.
• Sellers who care about brand preservation are leaving money on the table by going to the highest bidder. The buyer that pays 12x but rebrands the company in year one often destroys more value through retention loss than the 1x premium they paid. Founders who optimize for fit, not just price, get better long-term outcomes for their teams and their community-board relationships.
• The STR market is bifurcating. Casago and a few large regional operators (with destination concentration in Florida Gulf Coast, Smoky Mountains, North Carolina coast, and Hill Country Texas) are platform-grade. Below that line, hundreds of operators are running break-even or worse and have effectively no exit path. Owners should be realistic about which side they are on.
• Commercial PM is the most overlooked opportunity. The institutional players (Cushman & Wakefield, JLL, CBRE) do not actively pursue sub-$5M-revenue commercial managers, leaving a long tail of regional operators with no obvious platform buyer. Independent sponsors and family offices are starting to fill that gap and frequently pick up high-quality businesses at 7 to 8x with limited bidding.

If you’re a buyer, here’s what we recommend

Whether you are a first-time search fund buyer, an independent sponsor building a thesis, or a PE platform looking for add-ons, the property management playbook is consistent:

1. Pick a sub-vertical and stay disciplined. The economics of HOA, multifamily, SFR, commercial, and STR are different enough that a credible thesis lives inside one sub-vertical. Buyers who try to combine HOA and STR in a single platform usually fail.
2. Build the AUM math before you build the deal model. Doors multiplied by fee rate multiplied by retention multiplied by margin gets you 90% of the way to the right valuation. The remaining 10% is qualitative (board health, software stack, key-person risk).
3. Underwrite the software stack as a moat or a tax. A clean AppFolio, Buildium, Yardi, or RealPage implementation is a real premium. A patchwork of QuickBooks and spreadsheets is a real discount, and the cost to fix it should come out of purchase price, not your post-close budget.
4. Know the licensing patchwork before you cross state lines. Multi-state HOA portfolios in Florida, Nevada, California, Arizona, Texas, Colorado, Hawaii, or North Carolina require active license management. Build the inventory at LOI, not at close.
5. Win on fit, not just price. Property management is a relationship business. Buyers who pre-commit to brand preservation, key-employee retention, and operating continuity routinely beat higher bidders, particularly with founder sellers approaching retirement.

Working with CT Acquisitions as a buyer

We maintain a qualified buyer network spanning HOA platforms, multifamily strategics, SFR consolidators, commercial PM independent sponsors, and family-office capital looking specifically for long-hold property management exposure. We do not run broad auction processes. We match founders to the small number of buyers who are right for their specific business, sub-vertical, geography, and cultural fit.

For buyers, this means: no wasted time on mis-fit deals, early access to deals that have not gone to market, and a sellers-first reputation that founders trust. We are paid by the buyer at close; founders pay nothing.

If you are actively acquiring in property management, set up a 30-minute conversation to walk us through your thesis. We will be direct about whether our deal flow fits.

Frequently asked questions about buying a property management business

What EBITDA multiple should I pay for a property management business in 2026?

It depends on the sub-vertical. Buying a property management business in HOA / CAM at platform-grade quality (above $3M EBITDA, 90%+ retention, software-enabled operations) clears 10x to 13x EBITDA in 2026. Regional HOA operators trade 7.5x to 10x. Multifamily PM clears 8x to 11x. Commercial PM clears 7x to 10x. SFR trades 5x to 8x. STR trades 5x to 9x. The single largest variable within each sub-vertical is recurring fee retention.

How is a property management business actually valued?

The foundational math is AUM (doors, units, communities, or square feet) multiplied by realized fee rate (4 to 10% of residential rents, 1.5 to 3% of commercial rents, $12 to $35 per door per month for HOA, 20 to 35% take rate for STR) multiplied by a sub-vertical EBITDA margin (typically 18 to 30%) multiplied by the applicable EBITDA multiple. Buyers stress-test each input independently.

Who are the most active buyers of property management businesses?

FirstService Residential (NYSE: FSV) and Associa lead residential community management. RealManage (American Securities since June 2, 2022) and KWPMC (Odevo since September 2022) are the next platform consolidators. CMH (Charlesbank), Oakline (Alpine Investors), and Pioneer (FFL Partners) are the three newest HOA platforms launched in the 18 months to mid-2026. Greystar, Asset Living (Roark Capital), and Olympus Property (Levine Leichtman) lead multifamily. Cushman & Wakefield (NYSE: CWK), JLL, and CBRE lead commercial. Casago is now the largest STR consolidator following the April 30, 2025 Vacasa take-private at approximately $128.6M.

How long does it take to close a property management acquisition?

90 to 150 days from signed LOI to close for a well-prepared target. The binding constraints are typically trust-accounting validation, state CAM license transfer or reissuance (slower in Florida and Nevada), and software-data export and review. Multi-state portfolios extend timelines.

Should I use an SBA loan to buy a property management business?

SBA 7(a) financing works well for property management deals up to $5M purchase price because the recurring fee revenue produces clean debt service coverage. The constraint is the SBA requirement that the seller exit operationally within 12 months, which can conflict with the 24 to 36 month founder transitions that many platform-grade HOA targets require. For deals where the founder needs to stay 2+ years, commercial bank acquisition lending is usually a better fit.

What due diligence is required when buying a property management business?

Standard M&A diligence (quality of earnings, legal, insurance) plus property-management-specific: AUM and door-count reconciliation against software exports, contract review of every material management agreement, retention-cohort analysis, board health audit for HOA targets, software-data hygiene audit, trust accounting compliance review, state license inventory in CAM-regulated jurisdictions, and E&O claim history.

What makes a property management business a platform acquisition target?

Five characteristics: $1.5M+ EBITDA, 90%+ AUM retention, clean software stack (AppFolio, Buildium, Yardi, or RealPage with at least 3 years of clean data), management depth below the founder (COO and accounting lead in place), and credentialed staff in CAM-regulated states. Geographic fit for an existing platform footprint is a meaningful bonus.

How does the Vacasa to Casago transaction affect STR valuations?

The April 30, 2025 Vacasa take-private at approximately $128.6M reset the public comp ceiling for STR and vacation rental management. Pre-downturn, the segment cleared 10x to 15x on adjusted EBITDA. Post-transaction, regional STR multiples have compressed to 5x to 9x, with the upper end reserved for operators with destination concentration, strong owner contracts, and durable take rates.

Related resources for buyers

• Property management valuations and multiples (seller perspective): useful context on what sellers are being told
• Property management business valuation guide: full valuation framework
• Browse all buy-side playbooks: other vertical buyer guides
• Buying a janitorial business: adjacent recurring-services vertical
• Buying a restoration business: related property-services vertical